• Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers
    • Contact
    • Hire Me
    • About
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
Wes Anderson’s ‘The Phoenician Scheme’ Earns Mixed Reviews [Cannes]
IMG_5441.png
‘Die, My Move’ Sells to MUBI for $20M
IMG_5439.jpg
Justine Triet’s Next Film “In English With Some Major Stars”
IMG_5436.jpg
Box-Office: ‘Final Destination’ $53M, ‘Sinners’ Beats ‘Thunderbolts’
IMG_5435.png
Sylvain Chomet’s Next Film is ‘Triplets of Belleville’ Sequel
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers
  • About
    • Contact
    • Hire Me
    • About

Citizen Kane Loses 100% “Fresh” Rating on Rotten Tomatoes After 80-Year-Old Negative Review Added

April 27, 2021 Jordan Ruimy
Citizen-Kane-Rotten-Tomatoes-Score.jpg

The child prodigy that was Orson Welles. A theater genius who wowed everyone in his heyday, Welles was a hot commodity, turning down offer after offer in the ’30s until he was sent an offer he couldn’t refuse: Complete artistic control in acting, writing, directing, and producing any feature film of his choice. “Citizen Kane” was the next step — a bracing movie that, to this day, is still heralded as the greatest ever made (although “Vertigo” is now a contender).

And yet, the greatest movie of all time no longer has a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The moviereview-aggregation website added a negative review to the 115 positive ones already there — one that was published more than 80 years ago by a Chicago Tribune film critic. Kane’s score stands now at 99% fresh.

“It’s interesting. It’s different,” wrote the Tribune critic in his 1941 review, adding “In fact, it’s bizarre enough to become a museum piece. But its sacrifice of simplicity to eccentricity robs it of distinction and general entertainment value.”

‘Kane’ was a film so innovative that it widely considered to be the most influential film of all time. The fact that Welles was just 25 years old when “Citizen Kane” premiered at the Palace theater in 1941 is staggering and almost unheard of for a film this revolutionary and iconic. The technical aspect of the film is what astounds most people, but the fact that it was released 74 years ago is even more mind-blowing. It’s not surprising that a film critic was caught off-guard by the film’s innovation back in 1941, I’m sure there were more just waiting to have their reviews dug up by RT.

EDIT — Wikipedia quotes a few more film critics who were mixed-to-negative about ‘Kane’ back in the day:

”Otis Ferguson of The New Republic said it was "the boldest free-hand stroke in major screen production since Griffith and Bitzer were running wild to unshackle the camera", but also criticized its style, calling it a "retrogression in film technique" and stating that "it holds no great place" in film history.[122]  Ferguson reacted to some of the film’s celebrated visual techniques by calling them “just willful dabbling” and “the old shell game.”

“In his 1941 review for Sur, Jorge Luis Borges famously called the film "a labyrinth with no center" and predicted that its legacy would be a film "whose historical value is undeniable but which no one cares to see again."[124]”

“Eileen Creelman of The New York Sun called it “a cold picture, unemotional, a puzzle rather than a drama”.[43]. Other people who disliked the film were W. H. Auden [46]:98 and James Agee.[46]. After watching the film on January 29, 1942, Kenneth Williams, then aged 15, writing in his first diary curtly described it as "boshey rot",[128] bosh meaning empty or meaningless, nonsense or foolish.”

← The 10 Best TV Shows of the 2010s‘About Endlessness': Roy Andersson's Surreal Ode to Existence [Capsule] →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
IMG_5403.jpg
Ari Aster’s ‘Eddington’ POLARIZES; Starts as Satire, Ends in Horror — Not Everyone’s Buying It [Cannes]
IMG_5383.jpg
‘Sirat’ Screens — Surreal, Chaotic and Unsettling [Cannes]
IMG_5352.jpg
‘Mission: Impossible 8’ Review Embargo Breaks — It’s A Mess [Cannes]
IMG_5328.jpg
‘Sound of Falling’ Gets Bogged Down by Heavy Symbolism [Cannes]
IMG_4571.jpg
David Fincher & Brad Pitt Reunite for ‘The Continuing Adventures of Cliff Booth' + Plot Details

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
Critics Poll: ‘Mulholland Drive' Named Best Film of the 2000s
g4.jpg
Critics' Poll: ‘Goodfellas' Named Best Movie of the 1990s
Critics Poll: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road' Named Best Movie of the 2010s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2023